Modern Day /

Modern Day /

White Guilt

Photo credits

Baldwin, MLK, etc. “The White Problem in America.” Ebony Magazine, 1965, WorthPoint, 2025. Accessed 29 July 2025.https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/ebony-magazine-1965-white-problem-3857973962

What is White Guilt?

White guilt, originally coined by James Baldwin in his essay “The White Man’s Guilt,” is a term used by psychologists, philosophers, and historians alike to describe the feeling many white people have of bearing the responsibility for the past and present racism, colonialism, and genocide. Baldwin argues that a main cause of modern racism is white people’s plea of being innocent to avoid blame and protect their power. Contemporarily, it is now widely recognized as a feeling of guilt expressed in such a way that takes away from the struggles of the colonized and marginalized and puts the focus on the white person’s feelings of guilt.

Acknowledging White Guilt

Guilt is a normal, understandable feeling. As a white person, it is key to recognize and validate these feelings of guilt, but instead of then bringing these feelings into spaces, take the time to listen to marginalized voices and their experiences. The defining factor of white guilt is using this guilt to make the conversation or topic around yourself; it is not about you as a white person. 

Modern Day People

Ahmaud Arbery

Jacob Blake

Freddie Gray

George Floyd

Philando Castile

Michael Brown

Breonna Taylor

Eric Garner

Trayvon Martin

“Each of us is more than the worst thing we’ve ever done.”

- Bryan Stevenson

Lily

School - To - Prison Pipeline

“The school-to-prison pipeline refers to practices and policies that disproportionately place students of color into the criminal justice system. The biased application of harsh disciplinary measures and overuse of referrals to law enforcement contribute to the problem, setting up vulnerable students for failure and ignoring the underlying causes.

How can educators end the school-to-prison pipeline? The first step is considering an alternative approach to school discipline.”

(American University)

The (Knights of the) Ku Klux Klan

The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) has existed in several distinct iterations, each with its own specific focus and methods, but all united by an ideology of white supremacy and the use of violence and intimidation

First Klan (Reconstruction Era, 1865-1872):

  • Formed in Pulaski, Tennessee by Confederate veterans, aiming to maintain white supremacy and oppose Reconstruction efforts to grant political and civil rights to African Americans.

  • Used terror tactics like whippings, beatings, burning churches and schools, and murder to intimidate Black people and white Republicans.

  • Initially a decentralized organization, it later attempted to establish a hierarchical structure with Nathan Bedford Forrest as its purported leader.

  • Suppressed by federal intervention, including the Enforcement Acts and the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

Second Klan (Early 20th Century, 1915-1944):

  • Revived at Stone Mountain, Georgia, inspired by romanticized depictions of the first Klan in films like "Birth of a Nation".

  • Expanded its hateful agenda to include anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic, anti-Semitic, and anti-union sentiments, according to EBSCO Research Starters.

  • Used cross burnings and mass rallies as public displays of intimidation.

  • Gained widespread membership and political influence, even in the North, during the 1920s.

  • Declined due to scandals, internal conflicts, and federal prosecution, notes the FBI.

Third Klan (Mid-20th Century, 1946-present):

  • Emerged in response to the Civil Rights Movement, continuing the legacy of violence and intimidation against Black people and civil rights activists.

  • Though less organized and with fewer members than the second iteration, it remained a force of terror, responsible for bombings and murders, notes Study.com.

  • Its activities led to renewed federal intervention and prosecution of members

Modern-day KKK continues a lot of the same values and traditions as before, but one thing in particular has been on the rise: online rallies. These online rallies do many things, but two stick out. One of which is that it allows people to participate in these rallies without fear of being spotted or having their identity leaked. It creates a whole new type of anonymity. The other is that before these online rallies, the meetings were confined to the area around the specific branch of the Klan. Now, it has opened a much broader area and people who were unable to attend prior can now. There could be no (recorded/known) branch of the Klan in that state, but someone could still attend meetings. 

KKK "now" (contemporary reality)

  • Fragmented and diminished: The Klan today is far weaker than in its earlier iterations, characterized by internal conflicts, legal battles, and government infiltration, notes the Center for American Progress.

  • Shifting tactics: While still holding rallies and engaging in online activism, some groups try to present a more mainstream image, advocating for "white rights" rather than overtly racist rhetoric, according to Magnum Photos.

  • Low membership: Estimates vary, but membership is significantly lower than in previous periods, likely ranging in the low thousands, according to the Anti-Defamation League.

  • Adaptation and Collaboration: Some newer chapters have emerged from the dissolution of older ones, and there are signs of increased collaboration between Klan groups and other white supremacist organizations, notes the Southern Poverty Law Center.

  • Continued Struggle: Despite attempts at revival and adaptation, the Klan faces ongoing challenges including internal divisions and competition from other white supremacist groups,

Lillian’s Reflection on the Current and Past KKK and Modern-Day Hate Groups:

Something I like to do when learning history is compare what happened then to more modern events, and on our trip I couldn’t help but notice a lot of what is happening in our country now that reminded me of what we were learning. One thing that I regularly thought about, especially during my research, was ICE and what was happening regarding deportations.

ICE is a government-funded agency that was founded in 2003 and remained relatively quiet prior to 2024. They legally and humanely deported those who were reportedly actively harming the American people in some way, shape, or form. Recently, especially in California, we've seen a more violent and forceful approach by ICE in order to do their job. There have been reports of them taking people off the street with little to no probable cause and, in some cases, deporting them illegally—and in others, even to the wrong country entirely.

They have also been arresting American citizens who provided proof of their citizenship. There were cases in which, even after winning their cases, immigrants have been kept in custody. They have also been covering their faces and not providing proper identification, which has created a small (but still prevalent) trend of people dressing up as ICE agents in order to kidnap people.

So, why is this happening? I can’t give a 100% foolproof answer, but I can give what I believe the reason is. The current administration has asked for an increase in deportations, which opens up more of a need for more officers. This, along with how ICE—much like the military—offers community and a “third space” for people to meet and interact outside of work, creates a powerful draw. With an increase in jobs and the promise of a community with similar views, it attracts many types of people—some of whom, for the same reasons, may also be involved in hate groups.

Because of that, and the fact that they are being emboldened by the political climate along with those around them, it's no surprise we’ve seen a rise in violent behaviors by ICE. One well-known example of police brutality that was due to hatred and being emboldened and supported by authorities was Bloody Sunday. During the march from Selma to Montgomery, the marchers were met with police. The police proceeded to beat many people and chased them back to their churches.

Due to human nature, it's easy to assume that at least one of the officers was not inherently violent and had reservations. This does not make them any less guilty, and the level of violence was absolutely not necessary. But because of herd mentality, once one person becomes violent, it triggers something in the human brain that signals it’s either win or lose.

“The fight against Israel and its 77-year-long genocide against Palestine reminds me of the Civil Rights Movement. While the black people’s protests were much more effective in putting pressure on our leaders and eventually got resolved, both movements share the same determined energy to end the injustice. Every day, people still talk about Palestine. People still call out our “leaders” who support apartheid, the way black people called out leaders who let white supremacy slide. The spread of media prevalent in the fight for civil rights is also present in the fight for Palestine. Justice was only achieved for black people because people saw the atrocities being committed by the police, supposedly meant to protect them. Millions of videos of starving children, mutilated bodies, and endless bombings are released from Gaza every day to show everyone who they’re letting exercise their “right” to existence. Israel knows that knowledge is a weapon, explaining their constant censorship and manipulation of American media. While the fight isn’t the same, the principle is.”

— Lily